US/World News

Iranian nuclear scientist, a Mossad asset, smuggled to UK

(JTA) – An Iranian nuclear scientist was smuggled out of the country and into the United Kingdom in a joint operation involving the Mossad, the CIA and MI6, England’s intelligence service. After the MI6 and CIA questioned the scientist about Iran’s nuclear program and its future plans, he was flown to the United States. The unnamed scientist, 47, reportedly was an Israeli asset for years who is said to have helped plan the 2012 assassination of Mostafa Ahmadi Roshan, a nuclear scientist and director at Iran’s Natanz uranium enrichment facility.

Fearing that the scientist was about to be discovered, the Mossad smuggled him out of Iran in December after hatching the plan with the other security agencies in October, according to the report. The Mossad reportedly debriefed him before he continued on his journey.

“This wasn’t without its challenges. His absence was noted quickly, and we were informed that a special unit of Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps had been dispatched,” an unnamed British source said. England reportedly did not want to be seen as assisting the scientist, since it is still a signatory to the Iran nuclear deal. 

The scientist got to France and then had to be smuggled in to the United Kingdom. “It was determined infiltrating him into a group of fellow migrants preparing to cross the Channel by boat offered one solution,” the source said. He joined 11 other migrants on a dinghy that landed on the coast about 30 miles from Dover on Dec. 31, violating the conditions of their entry permits. As a human being and as a father, I hope that this will stop and the residents of Gaza will start prioritizing their children above everything else.”

CAP: MI6 headquarters in London (Photo – AP)

SHARE
RELATED POSTS
Pittsburgh’s Tree of Life synagogue moves forward with rebuilding plans
Atty general to decide if anti-Israel graffiti at Maine college is a hate crime
Southern Israelis call for stronger response to Gaza rocket fire

Leave Your Reply